India is not a “nation”: Brahminists can never suppress
ethnic fury by using brute force
The latest Shiv Sena violence in Bombay (Feb.11, 2010) over a
Brahminical film actor (with a Muslim name but Hindu wife) and
the total chaos in whole of Andhra Pradesh for the past several
months over Telengana should make the people ponder — if
thinking people are still left in India — over our oft-repeated
warning that India is not a “nation” but a subcontinent
of several warring nations.
Until this fact is realised and consciously acted upon there will
be no peace — much less development in this violent country.
Brahminic rulers cannot suddenly become nationalists today and
anti-nationalists tomorrow at the drop of hat to suit their jati interests.
Bal Thackeray as bum-licker: Remember, India
is not a “nation” and was never a nation. Our Constitution
drafted by the Father of India, Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar, nowhere says
India is a nation. The word “nation” was added much
later during the emergency. The Constitution calls (in its preamble)
it “India that is Bharat”. It does not even use the
detested word Hindustan.
Upper castes led by their mad flagship, Times of India,
are celebrating their bogus Aman-ki-Asha even while preparing
for war against Muslim Pakistan. Which one to believe?
Shiv Sena’s Kayasth (CKP) Bal Thackeray is the darling brother
of the Brahmana Jati Party (BJP). How could he suddenly
become the enemy of the Brahminists?
Foreigners in Bombay:The Marathi Brahmins never
loved the CKP fellow but they allowed him to lick their bum which
he did all these years with pleasure and indulged in all sorts
of illegal, anti-national crimes and became a multi-crorepati.
All these are allowed in Hindu India as long as you are a Brahmin
or a bum-licker.
But suddenly there was a rupture. If the SS supremo does not please
his Marathi Manoos constituency, his more powerful rival
nephew will overtake and steal his constituency.
The city of Bombay is the capital of Maharashtra. We have lived
in Bombay twice (1951 and then 1960). Even at that time the entire
city had been captured by predatory “foreigners” — Gujarati
Banias, Marwadis, Punjabis, Sindhis and Mangalore-Udupi hotliers — mostly
upper castes. Every cotton mill belonged to “foreigners”.
So also the Bollywood boys and girls. Journalists were all South
Indians, mostly Brahmins. So also the Dalal Street stock exchange.
Bombay — the financial capital of India — had no trace
of Marathi Manoos. Maharashtrian OBCs and Dalits were
mere sweat labour — pushed to slums. Their suffering produced
the phantom called Bal Thackeray.
Outsiders are welcome to Bombay but they cannot live sucking the
blood of the natives in the pretext “Bombay also belongs
to India”. Had the “foreigners” behaved like
brothers there would have been no heart-burning.
Agreed: “Bombay belongs to all Indians”. Then why
they debarred SC/ST/BCs from higher judiciary, defence services,
scientific institutions etc.? Why keep private sector as the Brahminical
monopoly?
The Brahminical people can’t accuse the White Australians
of racism while being the founding fathers of racism inside India.
Such Brahminical double-standards will eat its very creators.
India breaks into 3 pieces: Meanwhile, this enforced
artificial unity is breaking the country itself. The upper castes
(15%) for the first time in the 3,000-year history of India got
a “nation” to rule with their brute force. The moment
they started thinking of Indian “independence” with
so much of hate in their heart, it broke into three pieces —India,
Pakistan and then Bangladesh — with a third one Kashmir — hanging
at the top. Fearing more such nationality revolts Brahminical India
started arming itself to the teeth — suppressing Dalits
(20%), Tribals (10%), OBCs (35%), plus Muslim (15%), Christian
and Sikhs (5%).
Over 85% of the country’s “nations” and “sub-nations” are
crying for liberation.
The six “nations” listed above are also not full-fledged “nations”.
(Read, Caste-A Nation Within the Nation, V.T. Rajshekar,
Books for Change, Bangalore, 2002, Rs. 140, copy available with
DV).
The Mala-Madiga “caste war” in AP and the
latest thunder and lightning on Telengana prove that even a people
speaking the same language and listed as Scheduled Castes under
the constitution are not one nation.
Dr. Ambedkar in his book, Thoughts on Pakistan, (Pakistan
or the Partition of India, W&S, Vol.8, 1990, Maharashtra
Govt., Bombay) has beautifully summed up the nationality question
which we have elaborately discussed in our book on Caste.
Tamil Chettiar’s role: The mere 2% Brahminical
crooked brains with their Bania financiers are a drop in this vast
ocean of India with hundreds of “nations” threatening
the very existence of the Brahminist usurpers. So to defend them,
they have asked the a Tamil Chettiar (Bania) to strengthen the “national” security
setup.
The vaidik rulers are not so much bothered about the
external enemy (Pakistan). They are more worried about their ferocious
internal enemies — the hundreds of angry “nationals” crushed
under the feet of the Brahminical juggernaut.
So much so, the Brahminists fear their own shadow. They think
the millions of angry, unemployed, poverty-stricken, Marathi Manoos will
eat the pot-bellied Bombay’s Gujarati Banias alive.
SS Fuhrer: It is this very Brahminists who initially
encouraged the SS Fuhrer, financed him, glamourised him through
their manuwadi media. This phantom to which they gave
birth is today eating its very father.
The “nationality question” is rocking and breaking
the artificially built unity of India. Whenever a struggle on nationality
question breaks out it is denigrated and mercilessly put down as
separatism, regionalism, linguistic chauvinism and dubbed anti-national.
Worship of Bharat Mata: How many millions
of Kashmiri Muslims have been killed so far? How many thousands
of Sikhs shot dead? Anybody asking for his human rights is kicked,
killed, burnt, raped or simply shot dead in the name of India’s
bullshit “unity and integrity”.
Worship of the non-existent Bharat Mata is given priority
but the wellbeing of the millions of havenots is forgotten for
ever.
We can’t find greater anti-nationals than these
Brahminists killing India — bone by bone, nerve by nerve.
Not a single existing state in India is fulfilling the nationality
test.
Punjab in turmoil: Look how the upper caste hate-mongers
in Punjab divided the Punjabi-speaking Dalits (Ravidasias) from
the Jats. (DV Edit Dec.16, 2009, “Turmoil in Punjab”).
The Brahmins (2%) are also not a “nation”. So also
the Thakurs and Banias. India is a chaotic cockpit of hundreds
of warring “nations”.
Managing such an maddening crowd of million mutinees,
the 2% Brahminists may call it a “nation” with daggers
pointed at every head. But even the mightiest army cannot suppress
the nationality urges of a people.
This is called the “nationality question”, a subject
never discussed even in “intellectual circles”. Because
India’s “intellectuals” are corrupt and brain-dead
and mostly vaidiks and hence they put the stinking shit
under the carpet thinking that no bad smell will come out.
“Italian widow” & “future PM”: They
think their new-found darling, the son of their hated “Italian
widow”, would protect their ill-gotten property and pomp.
They took him on a guided tour through the crowded Bombay suburban
trains and boasted that the “future PM” would protect
their financial capital of India. The very next day Bombay exploded.
Only by bringing central forces they made the Bombay theatres to
exhibit the stupid film.
Break-up of USSR & Yugoslavia: Look how
Yugoslavia got shattered into pieces under the impact of nationality
upsurge. The breakup of the behemoth Soviet Russia should teach
us a lesson. Multiple, diverse nationality pulls and pressures
are cracking countries into pieces.
Khurds, Palestinians, Kashmiris are the uppermost questions today
crying for nationhood.
When India is a subcontinent of hundreds of such nationalities
crying for self-determination how can the mere 3% ruling grass-eating
Brahmin-Bania micro-minority hold it under their grip? They can
no longer put down nationality urges — contemptuously branding
them casteist, communal, chauvinistic, maoist, anti-national movements.
Need to study “nationality question”: There
is an urgent need to study the needs of “nations” fighting
for self-determination. Anti-“national” Brahminists
cannot decide on India’s nationhood — based on ethnicity,
language, territory, culture etc. The alien Brahminical culture
cannot rule over indigenous vibrant nations.
M.K. Gandhi and his bogus gandhism have been protecting the ruling
class. Finally they only killed him. The British, however, did
recognise the nationality urges. That is why the Brahminists groomed
Gandhi to fight the British. But the nationality question could
not be submerged under the gandhian carpet.
DV Jan.1, 2010 p. 11: “DV supports Telengana & all small
states” & “Death of Akhand Bharat — Signs
of India breaking into nation-states”.
DV Edit Nov.16, 2008: “Cracks expose India’s fragile
nation-hood: Raj Thackeray hammers Bharat Mata”.
DV Edit March 1, 2008: “Angry castes & tribes will explode
if Western-style democracy is imposed” & p.5: “Future
belongs to caste & regional parties”.
DV Edit May 1, 2005: “Wanted debate on nationality question — Strong
ethnic identity ensures sure defeat for Hindu nazi stunt called
cultural nationalism”.
DV March 1, 2005 p. 11: “Telugus worried over surge of Tamil
Nationalism”.
DV Edit March 16, 1996: “Dalit doubts & fears on nationality
question: Is it a bid to destroy growing caste consciousness?”
DV Edit July 1, 1986: “India breaking into nation states?”
Further reading
1. Nationality Qustion in India, TDSS, Seminar papers,
1987, pp.470.
2. Nationalism Without a Nation in India, Dr. G. Aloysius,
Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2008, pp.270.
|